Show
Historically, the Australian health system has not provided safe and high-quality care to meet the needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.31 The health system in the past included segregated wards and service entrances, deliberately different (substandard) care, forced removal of newborn babies from mothers who were considered ‘not competent’ or not able to provide the ‘right upbringing’, and removal of children from home while parents were sick in hospital and failure to return these children to their parents’ care. A study of 755 Aboriginal Victorians in 2013 reported that nearly all respondents (97%) had experienced at least one incident that they perceived as racist in the preceding 12 months.32 Institutionalised racism is ‘the collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour which amount to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people’.33,34 This should be seen in the context of systematic racism, which ‘operates across political, legal, economic and social systems’34 and is a predeterminant of institutionalised racism. Both forms of racism result in assumptions and attitudes that lead to bias in the safety and quality of health care, and can result in inadequate care and poorer health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. These historical events and experiences, coupled with personal and family experiences of institutionalised racism and disrespectful communication, contribute to mistrust in the system by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and, at times, an unwillingness to engage with healthcare services at all. A 2017 evaluation of Victorian hospitals found that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people continue to experience hospitals as sites of trauma and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workforce experience dangerous levels of vicarious trauma, cultural load and isolation.35,36 The literature considers cultural awareness and cultural competency on a continuum, contributing to a culturally safe environment that is respectful of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients and workforce. Cultural awareness is a basic understanding that there is diversity in cultures across the population. Cultural competency extends beyond individual skills or knowledge to influence the way that a system or services operate across cultures. It is a process that requires ongoing learning.37-39 One-off training does not create a culturally competent workforce, but could increase cultural awareness.40 A culturally safe workforce considers power relations, cultural differences and the rights of the patient, and encourages workers to reflect on their own attitudes and beliefs.1 Cultural respect is achieved when individuals feel safe and cultural differences are respected.1,41 Benefits for the health service organisation include:
Benefits for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community include:
Key tasks
Suggested strategies
Cultural awareness and safety programs are often believed to only benefit people from Aboriginal and/or non-Anglo, non-English speaking heritage in the workplace.
But, a well-developed and engaged cultural safety program will also create a general openness, increase workplace respect, and assist in mentally healthy work practices for all workers. It makes good business sense to commit to workplace cultural safety.
A culturally safe workplace has a defined set of values and principles, and demonstrates behaviours, attitudes, policies, and structures that enable all workers to work effectively cross-culturally. In a culturally safe workplace all workers feel comfortable, supported and respected. Workers will feel they can contribute to all appropriate discussions, they will work safer and be more productive. In the diverse environments in which we all live and work, the importance of being culturally safe at work cannot be underestimated.
Baumeister, R. (2011). The need- to-belong theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 2, 121–140. Colby, S. L. & Ortman, J. M. (2015). Current population reports: Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002). “Why can’t we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust”. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology 8 (2): 88–102. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2014). Bias breakdown (note: News release from the Annual Hate Crime Statistics Report). Accessed from https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2014/december/latest-hate-crime-statistics-report-released Mendes, W. B., Gray, H., Mendoza-Denton, R., Major, B., & Epel, E. (2007). Why egalitarianism might be good for your health: Physiological thriving during stressful intergroup encounters. Psychological Science, 18, 991–998. Nuwer, R. (2015). When cops lose control. Scientific American Mind, 26(6), 44–51. U.S. Census Bureau (2008). Hispanic population in the United States: 1970 to 2050. Accessed November 28, 2011 from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/hispanic_pop_presentation.html U.S. Census Bureau (2010). The Hispanic population: 2010. Accessed November 28, 2011 from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-04.pdf Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Heiphetz, L., & Bloodhart, B. (2014). The stereotypic behaviors of the powerful and their effect on the relatively powerless (pp. 247–266), in T. D. Nelson (Ed), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. New York: Psychology Press. Wong, G., Derthick, A. O., David, E. J. R., Saw, A., & Okazaki, S. (2014). The what, the why, and the how: A review of racial microaggressions research in psychology. Race and Social Problems, 6, 181–200. Extension is a Division of the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska—Lincoln cooperating with the Counties and the United States Department of Agriculture. University of Nebraska—Lincoln Extension educational programs abide with the nondiscrimination policies of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture. © 2016, The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska on behalf of the University of Nebraska—Lincoln Extension. All rights reserved. |