Explain two research findings that support the claim that biological factors are influential

What role do genetic and environmental influences play in determining intelligence? This question has been one of the most controversial topics throughout the history of psychology and remains a hot topic of debate to this day.

In addition to disagreements about the basic nature of intelligence, psychologists have spent a great amount of time and energy debating the various influences on individual intelligence. The debate focuses on one of the major questions in psychology: Which is more important—nature or nurture?

Today, psychologists recognize that both genetics and the environment play a role in determining intelligence.

It now becomes a matter of determining exactly how much of an influence each factor has.

Twin studies suggest that the variance in IQ is linked to genetics. This research suggests that genetics may play a larger role than environmental factors in determining individual IQ.

One important thing to note about the genetics of intelligence is that it is not controlled by a single "intelligence gene." Instead, it is the result of complex interactions between many genes. Next, it is important to note that genetics and the environment interact to determine exactly how inherited genes are expressed.

For example, if a person has tall parents, it is likely that the individual will also grow to be tall. However, the exact height the person reaches can be influenced by environmental factors such as nutrition and disease.

A child may be born with genes for brightness, but if that child grows up in a deprived environment where he is malnourished and lacks access to educational opportunities, he may not score well on measures of IQ.

• Studies show that IQ scores of identical twins may be more similar than those of fraternal twins.
• Siblings who were raised together in the same environment have more similar IQs than those of adopted children who were brought up in the same household.
  

In addition to inherited characteristics, other biological factors such as maternal age, prenatal exposure to harmful substances, and prenatal malnutrition may also influence intelligence.

Studies have found that people with lower intelligence are more likely to report criminal victimization, which can have serious consequences including physical injury, loss of property, and psychological and emotional trauma.

• Identical twins who were raised separately have less similar IQs than those of identical twins who grew up in the same household.
• School attendance has an impact on IQ scores .
• Children who breastfed for 12 months or longer had a higher IQ (about 3.7 points) at age 30.

So what are some of the environmental influences that can account for variances in intelligence?

For example, studies have found that first-born children tend to have higher IQs than later-born siblings.

Why? Many experts believe that this is because first-born children receive more attention from parents. Research also suggests that parents expect older children to perform better on a variety of tasks, whereas later-born siblings face lesser task-focused expectations.

Thanks for your feedback!

What are your concerns?

Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.

1. Plomin R, von Stumm S. The new genetics of intelligence. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(3):148-159. doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.104

2. Zheng Y, Rijsdijk F, Arden R. Differential environmental influences on the development of cognitive abilities during childhood. Intelligence. 2018;66:72-78. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.005

3. Boutwell BB, Connolly EJ, Barbaro N, Shackelford TK, Petkovsek M, Beaver KM. On the genetic and environmental reasons why intelligence correlates with criminal victimization. Intelligence. 2017;62:155-166. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.04.003

4. Oommen A. Factors influencing intelligence quotient. JNSK. 2014;1(4). doi:10.15406/jnsk.2014.01.00023

5. Ritchie SJ, Tucker-Drob EM. How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychol Sci. 2018;29(8):1358-1369. doi:10.1177/0956797618774253

6. Horta BL, Hartwig FP, Victora CG. Breastfeeding and intelligence in adulthood: due to genetic confounding? The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(12):e1276-e1277. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30371-1

7. Lehmann J-YK, Nuevo-Chiquero A, Vidal-Fernandez M. The early origins of birth order differences in children’s outcomes and parental behavior. J Human Resources. 2018;53(1):123-156. doi:10.3368/jhr.53.1.0816-8177

1. For a review of behavioral genetic methods and results, see Plomin Robert, et al. Behavioral Genetics. (4th ed.) 2001 [Google Scholar] For a recent review of findings in psychological domains, see Bouchard Thomas J, Jr, McGue Matt. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Human Psychological Differences. J. Neurobiology. 2003;54:4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. For a discussion of the genetic and environmental contributions to interactions between family members, see Reiss David, Neiderhiser Jenae M, et al. The Relationship Code: Deciphering Genetic and Social Influences on Adolescent Development. 2000 [Google Scholar]

3. Evans David M, et al. Biometrical Genetics. Biological Psychol. 2002;61:33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. See Plomin et al., supra note 1.

5. Id.

6. See id.

7. Id.; see also Bouchard & McGue, supra note 1.

8. Plomin et al., supra note 1.

9. For a review and recent findings of genetic and environmental influences on social attitudes, see Abrahamson Amy C, et al. Rebellious Teens? Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Social Attitudes of Adolescents. J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 2002;83:1392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Widom Cathy Spatz. The Cycle of Violence. Science. 1989;244:160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [hereinafter Widom, Cycle of Violence] Widom Cathy Spatz., editor. Does Violence Beget Violence? A Critical Examination of the Literature. Psychol. Bull. 1989;106:3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [hereinafter Widom, Does Violence Beget Violence].

11. See, e.g., Rhee Soo Hyun, Waldman Irwin D. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Twin and Adoption Studies. Psychol. Bull. 2002;128:490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Cherny Stacey S. Home Environmental Influences on General Cognitive Ability. In: DeFries John C, et al., editors. Nature and Nurture During Middle Childhood. 1994. p. 262. [Google Scholar]

13. For a detailed description of the gene-environment correlation and its different forms, see Plomin et al., supra note 1 and Evans et al., supra note 3.

14. See Evans et al., supra note 3.

15. Neiderhiser Jenae M, et al. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Mothering of Adolescents: A Comparison of Two Samples. Developmental Psychol. 2004;40:335, 342 tbl.4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. See Towers Hilary, et al. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Parenting and Marital Relationships: Current Findings and Future Directions. Marriage & Fam. Rev. 2001;33:11, 16–18. [Google Scholar]

17. Rowe David C. Environmental and Genetic Influence on Dimensions of Perceived Parenting: A Twin Study. Developmental Psychol. 1981;17:203. [Google Scholar]

18. O’Connor Thomas G, et al. A Twin-Sibling Study of Observed Parent-Adolescent Interactions. Child Dev. 1995;66:812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. O’Connor Thomas G, et al. Genotype-Environment Correlations in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence: Antisocial Behavioral Problems and Coercive Parenting. Developmental Psychol. 1998;34:970, 971. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Id. at 977.

21. See Evans et al., supra note 3, at 41–42.

22. Neiderhiser Jenae M. Family Environment in Early Childhood and Outcomes in Middle Childhood: Genetic Mediation. In: DeFries John C, et al., editors. Nature and Nurture During Middle Childhood. [Google Scholar] supra note 12, at 249.

23. Id.

24. For a good articulation of the confound between genetic and environmental factors in family studies and solutions using genetically controlled designs, see Moffitt Terrie E. The New Look of Behavioral Genetics in Developmental Psychopathology: Gene-Environment Interplay in Antisocial Behaviors. Psychol. Bull. 2005;131:533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. See Jaffee Sara R, et al. Physical Maltreatment Victim to Antisocial Child: Evidence of an Environmentally Mediated Process. J. Abnormal Psychol. 2004;113:44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Caspi Avshalom, et al. Role of Genotype in the Cycle of Violence in Maltreated Children. Science. 2002;297:851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Gene X environment interactions are conceptually and statistically distinct from GE correlations, although both represent ways in which genes and environment may influence behavior in combination. See generally Evans et al., supra note 3 (providing a detailed presentation of both gene X environment interactions and GE correlations and how they can be detected in genetically informative studies).

28. Plomin Robert, et al. Nature and Nuture: Genetic Contributions to Measures of the Family Environment. Developmental Psychol. 1994;30:32. [Google Scholar]

29. Segal Nancy L. Twin, Sibling, and Adoption Methods: Tests of Evolutionary Hypotheses. Am. Psychologist. 1993;48:943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Spotts Erica L, et al. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Marital Relationshios. J. Fam. Psychol. 2004;18:107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. McGue Matt, Lykken David T. Genetic Influence on Risk of Divorce. Psychol. Sci. 1992;3:368. [Google Scholar]

32. Jockin Victor, et al. Personality and Divorce: A Genetic Analysis. J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 1996;71:288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. See Widom, Cycle of Violence, supra note 10; Widom, Does Violence Beget Violence, supra note 10.

34. See Jaffee et al., supra note 25.

Page 2

Behavioral Genetic Model of Parent-Child Behavior