What are the economic benefits of regional trade agreements?

Free trade agreements are treaties that regulate the tariffs, taxes, and duties that countries impose on their imports and exports. The most well-known U.S. regional trade agreement is the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) which replaced the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) effective July 1, 2020.

The advantages and disadvantages of free trade agreements affect jobs, business growth, and living standards.

• Free trade agreements are contracts between countries to allow access to their markets.
• FTAs can force local industries to become more competitive and rely less on government subsidies.
• They can open new markets, increase gross domestic product (GDP), and invite new investments.
• FTAs can open up a country to degradation of natural resources, loss of traditional livelihoods, and local employment issues.
• Countries must balance the domestic benefits of free trade agreements with their consequences.

Free trade agreements are designed to increase trade between two or more countries. Increased international trade has the following six main advantages.

In 2003, the U.S. International Trade Commission estimated that NAFTA could increase U.S. economic growth by 0.1% to 0.5% per year. The USMCA is a modern trade agreement that recognizes the influence of technology on economies. It changed many original NAFTA rules and processes but also kept others intact.

According to a 2019 report, USMCA is expected to raise GDP by $68.2 billion (0.35%) and employment by 176,000 jobs (0.12%), with a likely positive impact on all broad industry sectors in its first five years.

Without free trade agreements, countries often protected their domestic industries and businesses. This protection often made them stagnant and non-competitive on the global market. With the protection removed, they became motivated to become true global competitors.

Free trade agreements also contribute to foreign investment. Investors will flock to the country. This adds capital to expand local industries and boost domestic businesses. It also brings in U.S. dollars to many formerly isolated countries.

Many governments subsidize local industries. After the trade agreement removes subsidies, those funds can be put to better use.

Global companies have more expertise than domestic companies to develop local resources. That's especially true in mining, oil drilling, and manufacturing. Free trade agreements allow global firms access to these business opportunities. When the multinationals partner with local firms to develop the resources, they train them in the best practices. That gives local firms access to these new methods.

Local companies also receive access to the latest technologies from their multinational partners. As local economies grow, so do job opportunities. Multinational companies provide job training to local employees.

The biggest criticism of free trade agreements is that they are responsible for job outsourcing. Here are some of the primary disadvantages.

Why does this happen? Reducing tariffs on imports allows companies to expand to other countries. Without tariffs, imports from countries with a low cost of living cost less. It makes it difficult for U.S. companies in those same industries to compete, so they may reduce their workforce. Many U.S. manufacturing industries did lay off workers as a result of NAFTA. ​​​​One of the biggest criticisms of NAFTA is that it sent jobs to Mexico.

The USMCA sought to address and correct these criticisms, requiring—for the first time in a trade agreement—that 40% to 45% of North American auto content be made by workers earning at least $16 per hour.

Many developing countries don't have laws to protect patents, inventions, and new processes. The laws they do have aren't always strictly enforced. As a result, corporations often have their ideas stolen. They must then compete with lower-priced domestic knock-offs.

Many emerging markets are traditional economies that rely on farming for most employment. These small family farms can't compete with subsidized agri-businesses in developed countries. As a result, they lose their farms and must look for work in the cities. This aggravates unemployment, crime, and poverty.

Multinational companies may outsource jobs to emerging market countries without adequate labor protections. As a result, women and children are often subjected to grueling factory jobs in sub-standard conditions.

Many smaller countries struggle to replace revenue lost from import tariffs and fees.

Emerging market countries often don't have many environmental protections. Free trade leads to the depletion of timber, minerals, and other natural resources. Deforestation and strip mining reduce their jungles and fields to wastelands.

In addition to threatening environmental resources, free trade agreements threaten native populations as well. As development moves into isolated areas, indigenous cultures can be destroyed. Local peoples are uprooted. Many suffer disease and death when their resources are polluted.

Free trade agreements are designed to combat trade protectionism, which has its own downsides. Trade protectionism produces high tariffs and only protects domestic industries in the short term. In the long term, global corporations will hire the cheapest workers wherever they are in the world to make higher profits.

A better solution than protectionism is the inclusion of regulations within trade agreements that protect against the disadvantages.

Environmental safeguards can prevent the destruction of natural resources and cultures. Labor laws prevent poor working conditions. The World Trade Organization enforces free trade agreement regulations.

Developed economies can reduce their agribusiness subsidies, keeping emerging market farmers in business. They can help local farmers develop sustainable practices. They can then market them as such to consumers who value that.

Countries can insist that foreign companies build local factories as part of the agreement. They can require these companies to share technology and train local workers.

NAFTA was created to promote cross-border trade among the U.S., Mexico, and Canada. The three countries sought to create a free trade agreement that would foster competition, increase investment opportunities, and create procedures for handling trade disputes. Although it had some serious downsides, NAFTA largely succeeded in achieving those goals. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) officially replaced NAFTA on July 1, 2020, to achieve the modern trade goals of the digital age.

Although these terms are often confused, there are significant differences between free trade and fair trade. Free trade agreements are aimed at fostering open trade between nations to improve economic growth among all involved parties. The fair trade movement is focused on fostering economic equity on a global scale so that the workers who make goods in other countries receive fair wages and improve their lives and communities.