Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214.
Article Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 774.
Article Google Scholar
Barbieri, C., & Booth, J. L. (2016). Support for struggling students in algebra: Contributions of incorrect worked examples. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 36–44.
Article Google Scholar
Begolli, K. N., & Richland, L. E. (2016). Teaching mathematics by comparison: Analog visibility as a double-edged sword. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 194–213. //doi.org/10.1037/edu0000056
Article Google Scholar
Begolli, K. N., & Richland, L. E. (2017). Bridging cognitive science and real classrooms: A video methodology for experimental research. The Journal of Experimental Education. //doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1347775
Article Google Scholar
Begolli, K. N., Richland, L. E., Jaeggi, S. M., Lyons, E. M., Klostermann, E. C., & Matlen, B. J. (2018). Executive function in learning mathematics by comparing representations: Incorporating everyday classrooms into the science of learning. Thinking & Reasoning. //doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1429306
Article Google Scholar
Berliner, D. C. (2002). Comment: Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.
Article Google Scholar
Billings, E. M. H. (2001). Problems that encourage proportion sense. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(1), 10.
Article Google Scholar
Booth, J. L., Cooper, L. A., Donovan, M. S., Huyghe, A., Koedinger, K. R., & Paré-Blagoev, E. J. (2015a). Design-based research within the constraints of practice: AlgebraByExample. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1–2), 79–100. //doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.986674
Article Google Scholar
Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 24–34. //doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.002
Article Google Scholar
Booth, J. L., McGinn, K. M., Barbieri, C., Begolli, K. N., Chang, B., Miller-Cotto, D., ... & Davenport, J. L. (2017). Evidence for cognitive science principles that impact learning in mathematics. In Acquisition of complex arithmetic skills and higher-order mathematics concepts (pp. 297–325). Academic Press.
Booth, J. L., McGinn, K. M., Young, L. K., & Barbieri, C. (2015b). Simple practice doesn’t always make perfect: Evidence from the worked example effect. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 24–32. //doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601691
Article Google Scholar
Booth, J. L., & Newton, K. J. (2012). Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 247–253.
Article Google Scholar
Booth, J. L., Newton, K. J., & Twiss-Garrity, L. K. (2014). The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 118(1), 110–118. //doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.001
Article Google Scholar
Booth, J. L., Oyer, M. H., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Elliot, A. J., Barbieri, C., Augustine, A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2015c). Learning algebra by example in real-world classrooms. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(4), 530–551. //doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1055636
Article Google Scholar
Boyer, T. W., & Levine, S. C. (2015). Prompting Children to Reason Proportionally: Processing Discrete Units as Continuous Amounts., 51(5), 615–620.
Google Scholar
Bramwell, R., West, H., & Salmon, P. (2006). Health professionals’ and service users’ interpretation of screening test results: Experimental study. BMJ British Medical Journal, 333(7562), 284. //doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38884.663102.AE
Article Google Scholar
Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2012). Children’s understanding of probability: A literature review (full report). Londres: The Nuffield Foundation.
Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Slavinsky, J. P., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2014). Integrating cognitive science and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 331–340. //doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9256-4
Article Google Scholar
Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 355.
Article Google Scholar
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2015). The worked example effect, the generation effect, and element interactivity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 689.
Article Google Scholar
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2017). The expertise reversal effect is a variant of the more general element interactivity effect. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 393–405.
Chi, M. T., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.
Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182.
Article Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Article Google Scholar
Daniel, D. B. (2012). Promising principles: Translating the science of learning to educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 251–253. //doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.004
Article Google Scholar
DeWolf, M., Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2015). From rational numbers to algebra: Separable contributions of decimal magnitude and relational understanding of fractions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 133, 72–84. //doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.013
Article Google Scholar
DeWolf, M., & Vosniadou, S. (2013). The representation of fraction magnitudes and the whole number bias reconsidered. Learning and Instruction. //doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.002
Article Google Scholar
DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mîndrilă, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11.
Google Scholar
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Despite their promise, there’s still a lot to learn about techniques that support durable learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 254–256. //doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.003
Article Google Scholar
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. //doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Article Google Scholar
Falk, R., & Wilkening, F. (1998). Children’s construction of fair chances: Adjusting probabilities. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1340–1340.
Article Google Scholar
Falk, R., Yudilevich-Assouline, P., & Elstein, A. (2012). Children’s concept of probability as inferred from their binary choices-revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics. //doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9402-1
Article Google Scholar
Fergusson-Hessler, M., & de Jong, T. (1990). Studying physics texts: Differences in study processes between good and poor performers. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 41–54.
Article Google Scholar
Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1984). Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(1), 1–24.
Article Google Scholar
Fryer, R. G., Jr., & Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 447–464.
Article Google Scholar
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 372–396. //doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00029.x
Article Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2009). Knowing your chances. Scientific American Mind, 20(2), 44–51.
Article Google Scholar
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 295–314.
Article Google Scholar
Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? Brain Research Reviews, 17(6), 173–196. //doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12437708
Article Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2012). Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth, 17(4), 267–321. //doi.org/10.1007/s10887-012-9081-x
Article Google Scholar
Hoffrage, U., & Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 73(5), 538–540.
Article Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454.
Article Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
Article Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509–539.
Article Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001a). Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 5–23.
Article Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001b). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 579.
Article Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effect and its instructional implications: Introduction to the special issue. Instructional Science, 38(3), 209–215.
Article Google Scholar
Kapur, M., & Bielczyz, K. (2011). Classroom-based experiments in productive failure. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 33, No. 33).
Klahr, D., & Li, J. (2005). Cognitive research and elementary science instruction: From the laboratory, to the classroom, and back. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(2), 217–238. //doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-4423-5
Article Google Scholar
Kornell, N., Rabelo, V. C., & Klein, P. J. (2012). Tests enhance learning-Compared to what? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 257–259. //doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.002
Article Google Scholar
Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160.
Article Google Scholar
Labarge, A. S., McCaffrey, R. J., & Brown, T. A. (2003). Neuropsychologists’ abilities to determine the predictive value of diagnostic tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(2), 165–175.
Article Google Scholar
Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S., & Philips, E. (2006). Connected mathematics two. Prentice Hall (School Division).
Lemke, M., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Partelow, L., Miller, D., Williams, T., Kastberg, D., & Jocelyn, L. (2004). International outcomes of learning in mathematics literacy and problem solving: PISA 2003 Results from the US perspective. Highlights. NCES 2005-003. US Department of Education.
Martignon, L., & Krauss, S. (2009). Hands-on modelling with Wason cards and tinker cubes: First steps in logical and Bayesian reasoning in fourth grade. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3).
Mayer, R. E. (2012). Advances in applying the science of learning to education: An historical perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 249–250. //doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.001
Article Google Scholar
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). Author.
National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. In Foundations (Vol. 37, Issue 9). //doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08329195
Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part I—Differentiation of stages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(2), 217–253.
Article Google Scholar
Nunes, T., Bryant, P. E., Evans, D., Gottardis, L., & Terlektsi, M. E. (2014). The cognitive demands of understanding the sample space. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(3), 437–448. //doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0581-3
Article Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning from performance errors. Psychological Review, 103(2), 241–262. //doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.241
Article Google Scholar
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122.
Article Google Scholar
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710.
Article Google Scholar
Pashler, H., Bain, P. M., Bottge, B. A., Graesser, A. C., Koedinger, K. R., McDaniel, M. A., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning. IES Practice Guide. NCER 2007-2004 (pp. 63–63).
Peterson, R. A. (2000). A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters, 11(3), 261–275.
Article Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children.(Trans L. Leake, P. Burrell & HD Fishbein). WW Norton.
Post, T., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. (1988). Proportionality and the development of prealgebra understandings. The Ideas of Algebra, K–12, 78–90.
Prinz, R., Feufel, M. A., Gigerenzer, G., & Wegwarth, O. (2015). What counselors tell low-risk clients about HIV test performance. Current Hiv Research, 13(5), 369–380.
Article Google Scholar
Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21(1), 1–29.
Article Google Scholar
Renkl, A. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example‐based learning. Cognitive Science, 38(1), 1–37.
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15–22.
Article Google Scholar
Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(4), 293–315
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 90–108.
Article Google Scholar
Richardson, M. W., & Kuder, G. F. (1939). The calculation of test reliability coefficients based on the method of rational equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(9), 681.
Article Google Scholar
Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. //doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346
Article Google Scholar
Rogers, W. (1994). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 3(13).
Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2005). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 271–286.
Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. Microdevelopment: Transition Processes in Development and Learning, 31–58.
Siegler, R. S., & Lortie-Forgues, H. (2014). An integrative theory of numerical development. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 144–150. //doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12077
Article Google Scholar
Stark, R. (2004). Implementing example-based learning and teaching in the context of vocational school education in business administration. Learning Environments Research, 7(2), 143–163.
Article Google Scholar
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 351–362.
Article Google Scholar
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59–89.
Article Google Scholar
Traub, R. E. (1994). Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and applications (Vol. 3). Sage.
Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2012). Bridging the gap between the dense and the discrete: The number line and the “rubber line” bridging analogy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14, 265–284. //doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.717378
Article Google Scholar
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Depaepe, F., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2003). The illusion of linearity: Expanding the evidence towards probabilistic reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(2), 113–138.
Article Google Scholar
van Loon-Hillen, N., Van Gog, T., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2012). Effects of worked examples in a primary school mathematics curriculum. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 89–99.
Article Google Scholar
Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273–281.
Article Google Scholar
Widaman, K. F., Helm, J. L., Castro-Schilo, L., Pluess, M., Stallings, M. C., & Belsky, J. (2012). Distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 615.
Article Google Scholar
Zhu, L., & Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Children can solve Bayesian problems: The role of representation in mental computation. Cognition, 98(3), 287–308.
Article Google Scholar
Page 2
From: Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability
1 | 1 | C |
1 | 2 | T |
2 | 1 | C |
2 | 2 | C |
2 | 3 | T |
3 | 1 | C |
3 | 2 | T |
3 | 3 | T |
4 | 1 | C |
5 | 1 | T |