I have two proofs here one which I did and the other was given in book. Is one better than the other? I am asking for in an exam setting which proof makes a better solution(as in fetch more marks).
Proof 1 (My proof)
$f'(x)=3x^2-3$, in the interval $(0,1)$ is less than $0$. If there were two distinct roots then $f'(0)$ should have been $0$ once in $(0,1)$ by rolle's theorem. Since it isn't there are no values of $k$ for which there are two real roots.
Proof 2 (Book)
Let $a,b$ be two roots of $f(x)$ in $(0,1)$ then there exists a $c$ such the $f'(c) = 0$ for c in $[a,b] $ by Rolle's theorem. $f'(c)= 3c^2-3$ has no solutions in $(0,1)$ hence there is no such value of $k$.
Dave, from Burnham Grammar School, got us started by showing that the seventh statement is never true. Here is his solution: If $c=0$ then $ax^2 + bx = 0$ where $a \neq 0$.
It then follows that this equation can be factorized to give $x(ax+b) = 0$.
What we then see is that the curve has a root at $x = 0$ and at $x = -b/a$, so it always has at least one real root.
He also gave an alternative way of thinking about this using the discriminant:
If $c=0$, then the discriminant is $b^2 - 4ac = b^2 - 4a(0) = b^2$. From that we have seen the discriminant is always positive when $b \neq 0$ and so the quadratic $ax^2 + bx = 0$ always has two real distinct roots. However, if $b = 0$ then the quadratic becomes $ax^2 = 0$, and the discriminant would be : $b^2 - 4ac = (0)^2 - 4a(0) = 0$. As the discriminant would always be 0, the quadratic $ax^2 = 0$ will always have one repeated root.Well done to Julian from British School Manila and Alexander who managed to complete all the questions. All the answers were correct except for subtle points in parts 4 and 11 (see the editorial comments below). Here are Alexander's answers and very clear explanations. To start with he has collected together some of the facts about the discriminant he found useful to refer to in his answers:
Before we start to answer the main statements, let us prove a few useful facts first: $ax^2+bx+c = 0$ $⇔ x^2+\frac{bx}{a}+\frac{c}{a} = 0$ $⇔ x^2+\frac{bx}{a} = \frac{-c}{a} (as a \neq 0)$ $⇔ (x+\frac{b}{2a})^2-\frac{b^2}{(4a^2)} = \frac{-4ac}{(4a^2)}$ $⇔ (x+\frac{b}{2a})^2= \frac{b^2-4ac}{4a ²}$ $⇔ x+\frac{b}{2a} = ±\frac{\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$ $⇔ x = \frac{(b ±\sqrt{b^2-4ac})}{2a}$ (i) $⇒$If $b^2-4ac > 0$, Then it must have two square roots, and therefore the equation must have exactly two real roots. (ii) $⇒$If $b^2-4ac = 0$, Then it must have one square root (0), and therefore the equation must have exactly one (repeated) real root. (iii) $⇒$If $b^2-4ac < 0$, Then it must have no square roots, and therefore the equation must have exactly zero real roots. (iv) Let us refer to ($b^2-4ac$) as the discriminant of an equation.Here are his answers.
(1) SOMETIMES I give two examples: $-x^2-3x-2 = 0$ $⇒$ The discriminant = $(-3)^2-(4 \times (-1) \times (-2))= 9-8= 1 > 0$ So through (ii), we see that this equation has two real roots. $-x^2-2x-100$ $⇒$The discriminant $= (-2)^2-(4 \times (-1) \times (-100)) = 4-400 = -396 < 0$ So through (iv), we see that this equation has no real roots. Using (iv), we see that if $a < 0$, the equation has no real roots if and only if $b^2-4ac < 0$. (2) ALWAYS Through (iii), we see that if $b^2-4ac = 0$, then the equation has one (repeated) real root. (3) ALWAYS The discriminant of the equation $ax^2+bx+c$ is $b^2-4ac$. Through (iv), we can easily say that given that the equation has no real roots, then $b^2-4ac < 0$. $b^2-4ac < 0$ $⇒ b^2 < 4ac$ But as $b^2$ is always non-negative, $4ac$ must therefore be positive. The discriminant of the equation $ax^2+bx-c$ is $b^2-4a \times(-c) = b^2+4ac$ And as we know already that $4ac$ is positive, and $b^2$ is non-negative, $b^2+4ac$ must be positive, $⇒$ The discriminant of the equation $ax^2+bx-c$ is positive, $⇒$ Through (ii), the equation $ax^2+bx-c$ must have two distinct real roots. (4) NEVER If $\frac{b^2}{a} < 4c$ Then $b^2 < 4ac$ $⇒ b^2-4ac < 0$ $⇒$ Through (iv), the equation has no real roots.In fact this statement is sometimes true; for example the quadratic $-x^2+1$ with $a=-1,b=0,c=1$ has $\frac{b^2}{a}=0<4=4c$ and yet $1$ is a real root. The reason the proof didn't work is because in the first step the inequality was multiplied through by $a$, and since in this case $a$ is a negative number it would reverse the sign of the inequality.
In fact this statement is only sometimes true because of the fact that you may not get a quadratic when you swap $a$ and $c$ around since $c$ can be $0$. So for example the equation $x^2+x=0$ has two solutions ($0$ and $-1$) but the equation $x+1=0$ which has $a$ and $c$ reversed, only has one solution ($-1$).
(12) NEVER $-ax^2-bx-c = 0$ $⇒ ax^2+bx+c = 0$ Therefore, if $ax^2+bx+c = 0$ has no real roots, Then $-ax^2-bx-c = 0$ has no real roots also.Julian and Classmates also came up with their own discriminating question
(13) Trees with negative discriminants are able to stand.Answer:
NEVER TRUEThey have no real roots.